Dataset Browser

This inaugural dissertation thoroughly examines the multifaceted office and duties of a judge, drawing a critical distinction between the noble, ethical exercise of justice and the potentially mercenary or compromised aspects of the role. It provides a foundational analysis of judicial responsibility and the inherent conflicts that can arise within the judiciary.

The confirmation hearings for Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh were marked by intense scrutiny, prompting numerous inquiries into his past conduct and judicial philosophy. This article examines the specific unanswered questions that surfaced, detailing the areas where Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation testimony was perceived as incomplete or evasive, raising concerns about judicial ethics and his fitness as a supreme court nominee.

Exploring the complex intersection of legality and ethics in the realm of judging, this analysis delves into the potential conflicts that arise when strict adherence to the law clashes with moral principles. It examines the boundaries of legal authority and the ethical considerations that should guide judicial decision-making, particularly in situations where the legality of an action may be questionable or lead to unjust outcomes. The investigation also confronts the controversial issue of 'lawless judging' and its implications for the integrity of the legal system.